Divisibility rules are one of the important topics of study in school mathematics, especially in upper primary classes They enable us to quickly identify if one number is divisible by another. We know various methods for checking the divisibility of a number by 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10 etc. It is also clear that checking of divisibility of the given number by some numbers is quite easy, while for some numbers is a bit complicated.

Divisibility by 7 is a challenging one, with many attempts made to simplify the rule. Chika’s divisibility rule for 7 is a recent one among them. Here, we shall discuss three different divisibility methods for 7, using existing methods which add new dimensions to the concept.

Method 1: Doubling the unit digit

Take the given numberRemove the unit digit and write the truncated number Double the unit digit which was removedSubtract the doubled digit from the truncated numberIf the difference is either 0 or a multiple of 7, then the original number is divisible by 7. (Repeat if necessary)
532532 × 2 = 453 – 4 = 4949 is divisible by 7 so 532 is
also divisible by 7
427422 × 7 = 1442 − 14 = 2828 is divisible by 7 so 427 is
also divisible by 7
29792
2975
287
2979
297
28
2 × 2 = 4
2 × 5 = 10
2 × 7 = 14
2979 − 4 = 2975
297 − 10 = 287
28 − 14 = 14
Repeat for 2975
Repeat for 287
14 is divisible by 7 so 29792
is also divisible by 7
Try 2308012
now

With the above examples, we understand that this method is useful for checking divisibility by 7 without performing long division for a 3-digit number, but is quite lengthy for 4 or more-digit numbers.

Justification of the rule

Suppose \(N = 1000\ a_{3}+ 100\ a_{2} + 10\ a_{1} + a_{0}\)
(Where \(a_{0}, a_{1}, a_{2}, a_{3}\) are the digits of the 4-digit number N)

According to the rule, we write the truncated version (say \(N_{T}\)) without the unit digit of N and then take away (subtract) from \(N_{T}\) twice the unit digit to get a new number (say M).

\(N_{T} = 100\ a_{3}+ 10\ a_{2} + a_{1}\) (Note the change in the place values after the number is truncated)
\(M = N_{T} – 2a_{0} = 100\ a_{3} + 10\ a_{2} + a_{1} – 2a_{0}\)

Our rule says that if M is a multiple of 7, then N is also a multiple of 7.
Assume that M is a multiple of 7, i.e. M = 7k for some whole number k.

Then, \(M = 7k = 100 a_{3} + 10 a_{2} + a_{1} – 2a_{0}\) or \(100 a_{3} + 10 a_{2} + a_{1} =7k + 2a_{0}.\) Substituting this in N, we get

\(N = 1000\ a_{3} + 100\ a_{2} + 10\ a_{1} + a_{0}\)
\(N = (1000\ a_{3} + 100\ a_{2} + 10\ a_{1} )+ a_{0} = 10(100\ a_{3} + 10\ a_{2} + a_{1} ) + a_{0}\)
\(= 10(7k + 2a_{0}) + a_{0} = 70k + 21a_{0} = 7(10k + 3a_{0})\)

So, if M is a multiple of 7, then so is N.
This can easily be generalized to any number of digits.

Method 2: Multiplying the unit digit by 5

Take the given numberRemove the unit digit and write the truncated number Multiply the
unit digit by 5
Add the result to the truncated numberIf the sum is either 0 or a multiple of 7, then the original number is divisible by 7 (Repeat if necessary)
378378 × 5 = 4037 + 40 = 7777 is divisible by 7 so 378 is also
divisible by 7
24642465 × 4 = 20246 + 20 = 266Repeat for 266
266266 × 5 = 3026 + 30 = 5656 is a multiple of 7, So 266 and 2464 are divisible by 7
29792
2989
343
2979
298
34
2 × 5 = 10
9 × 5 = 45
3 × 5 = 15
2979 + 10 = 2989
298 + 45 = 343
34 + 15 = 49
Repeat for 2989
Repeat for 343
49 is a multiple of 7 so 343,
2989 and 29792 are divisible
by 7
Try 2308012
now

One may provide a justification, which is very similar to the previous one as follows.

Suppose \(N = 1000\ a_{3} + 100\ a_{2}+ 10\ a_{1} + a_{0}\)
(Where \(a_{0}, a_{1}, a_{2}, a_{3}\) are the digits of the 4-digit number N)

According to the rule, we write the truncated version (say NT) of N and add five times the unit digit to get a new number (say M).

\(N_{T} = 100\ a_{3}+ 10\ a_{2} + a_{1}\)
\(M = N_{T} + 5a_{0} = 100\ a_{3} + 10\ a_{2} + a_{1} + 5a_{0}\)

Our rule says that if M is a multiple of 7, then N is also a multiple of 7.
Assume that M is a multiple of 7, i.e. M = 7k for some whole number k.

Then, \(M = 7k = 100 a_{3} + 10 a_{2} + a_{1} + 5a_{0}\) or \(100 a_{3} + 10 a_{2} + a_{1} =7k – 5a_{0}\). Substituting this in N, we get

\(N = 1000\ a_{3} + 100\ a_{2} + 10\ a_{1} + a_{0}\)
\(N = (1000\ a_{3} + 100\ a_{2} + 10\ a_{1} )+ a_{0} = 10(100\ a_{3} + 10\ a_{2} + a_{1} ) + a_{0}\)
\(= 10(7k – 5a_{0}) + a_{0} = 70k – 49a_{0} = 7(10k – 7a_{0})\)

So, if M is a multiple of 7, then so is N.
This can easily be generalized to any number of digits.

Method 3: Grouping of digits (Rule – 1-3-2)

Take the NumberMake groups of three digits
starting from the unit digit
Multiply the right-most digit by 1,
the next by 3 and the left-most by 2 in each group
Add all odd-numbered groupsAdd all even-numbered groupsDifference
|c − d|
abcde
N₁ = 6726726 × 2 + 7 × 3 + 2 × 1 = 3535035
Result:| c – d |= 35 is divisible by 7. So, the number N1 is also divisible by 7.
N₂ = 4704004 7044 × 1 = 4
7 × 2 + 0 × 3 + 4 × 1 = 18
184|18 − 4| = 14
Result:| c – d |= 14 is divisible by 7 So, the number N2 is also divisible by 7.
N₃ = 32921032
921
3 × 3 + 2 × 2 + 1 × 1 = 11
9 × 2 + 2 × 3 + 1 × 1 = 25
2511|25 − 11| = 14
Result:| c – d |= 14 is divisible by 7. So, the number N3 is also divisible by 7.
N₄ = 197526197
526
1 × 2 + 9 × 3 + 7 × 1 = 36
5 × 2 + 2 × 3 + 6 × 1 = 22
2236|36 − 22| = 14
Result:| c – d |= 14 is divisible by 7. So, the number N4 is also divisible by 7.
N₅ = 164953552568164
953
525
268
1 × 2 + 6 × 3 + 4 × 1 = 24
9 × 2 + 5 × 3 + 3 × 1 = 36
5 × 2 + 2 × 3 + 5 × 1 = 21
2 × 2 + 6 × 3 + 8 × 1 = 30
30 + 36 = 6621 + 24 = 45|66 − 45| = 21
Result:21 is divisible by 7. So, the number N5 is divisible by 7.

This is yet another way of checking for divisibility by 7. Let’s illustrate it step by step.

  1. Starting from the unit place of the number, make groups of three digits. The last group will contain the remaining digits.
  2. In each group, multiply the right-most digit by 1, the next by 3 and the left-most by 2.
  3. Add all the products obtained in each group.
  4. Find the sums of the odd and even-numbered groups.
  5. If the difference of these two sums is divisible by 7 or is 0, then the original number will be divisible by 7.

Justification of the rule

Suppose \(N = 100000\ a_{5} + 10000\ a_{4} + 1000\ a_{3} + 100\ a_{2} + 10\ a_{1} + a_{0}\)
(Where \(a_{0}, a_{1}, a_{2}, a_{3}, a_{4}, a_{5},\) are the digits of the 6-digit number N)

\(S1 = a_{0} \times 1 + a_{1} \times 3 + a_{2} \times 2\)
\(S2 = a_{3} \times 1 + a_{4} \times 3 + a_{5} \times 2\)
\(M = S_{1} – S_{2}\)

Our rule says that if M is a multiple of 7, then N is also a multiple of 7.
Assume that M is a multiple of 7, i.e. M = 7k for some whole number k.

\(7k = (a_{0} × 1 + a_{1}, × 3 + a_{2} × 2) – ( a_{3} × 1 + a_{4} × 3 + a_{5} × 2)\)
\(= (-2a_{5} – 3a_{4} – a_{3} + 2a_{2} + 3a_{1} + a_{0})\)

\(N = (100002a_{5} – 2a_{5}) + (10003a_{4} – 3a_{4}) + (1001a_{3} – a_{3}) + (98a_{2} + 2a_{2})\) \(+ (7a_{1} + 3a_{1}) + a_{0}\)

\(N = 7(14286a_{5} + 1429a_{4} + 143a_{3} + 14a_{2} + a_{1}) + (-2a_{5} – 3a_{4} – a_{3} + 2a_{2}\) \(+ 3a_{1} + a_{0})\)

\(N = 7(14286a_{5} + 1429a_{4} + 143a_{3} + 14a_{2} +a_{1}) + 7k\)

So, if M is a multiple of 7, then so is N.
This can easily be generalized to any number of digits.

Note: Rule – 1-3-2 can be used for any number with 2 or more digits. It can help us to find the divisibility of any number by 7 easily and quickly as well.

Comparison

MethodOperations neededRemark
Doubling the unit digit×, –Useful for 2 or 3-digit numbers.
Unit digit is multiplied by 5×, +Useful for 2 or 3-digit numbers.
Rule 132×, +, – groupingUseful for more than 3-digit numbers.

Explorations such as this help teachers plan lessons in which students develop capacities for problem-solving, logical reasoning, and computational thinking. Students become comfortable in working with abstractions and other core techniques of Mathematics and Computational Thinking, such as the mathematical modelling of phenomena and the development of algorithms to solve problems. (NCF-SE 2023).

If the teaching of divisibility rules stops at practising number skills, then we are severely limiting the potential of such a rich topic. Asking why the rule works, trying to generalise it, comparing different rules and then trying to make their own rules will not just develop mathematical minds but also impart an understanding of the joy and beauty of the subject.

More Articles